The Supreme Court of Canada has declined to hear constitutional challenges against the country’s no-fly regime, effectively upholding the government’s authority to restrict air travel for individuals flagged as potential security risks.
The case involved two men, Bhagat Singh Brar and Parvkar Singh Dulai, who were prevented from boarding flights in Vancouver and subsequently challenged the Secure Air Travel Act watchlist, commonly known as the no-fly list, on constitutional grounds.
The Federal Court previously ruled that the government had reasonable grounds to suspect the individuals of potential involvement in terrorism-related travel, a decision that was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal last year. With the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case, the ruling stands, reinforcing the government’s mandate to screen and prohibit passengers from boarding flights based on national security concerns.
Under the Secure Air Travel Act, federal officials notify airlines when a passenger requires additional screening or is barred from flying. The no-fly regime has been a point of legal contention, with critics arguing that it lacks transparency and due process, while the government maintains that it is a critical tool in preventing potential threats.
The Supreme Court’s decision signals continued judicial support for the security measures in place, leaving affected individuals with limited avenues for further legal recourse.